Category: Press Releases

Vaşinqton Dehli ilə əlaqələri genişləndirməyə çalışır. ABŞ prezidentinin milli təhlükəsizlik məsələləri üzrə müşaviri Cek Sallivanla Hindistan baş nazirinin təhlükəsizlik müşaviri Adcit Dovalla Vaşinqtonda keçirilən görüşündə hərbi əməkdaşlığını genişləndiriməsi yolları müzakirə olunub. Tərəflər super bilgisayarlar və yüksək texnologiyalar sahələrində əlaqələrin genişlədirilməsini vacib olduğunu bildiriblər. ABŞ prezidenti Co Bayden və Hindistanın baş naziri baş nazir Narendra Modi daha əvvəl bu barədə razılığa gəliblər.

“New York Times” qəzetində yayımlanan məqalədə Ağ Evin vaxtilə bu sahələrdə Çinlə əməkdaşlığa üstünlük verdiyi yazılıb. Həmin dövr geridə qalıb. Hazırda Çin və ABŞ yüksək texnologiyalar sahəsində rəqib ölkələrdir. Vaşinqton müxtəlif texnologiyaların istehsalında liderliyi Çindən Hindistana keçməsinə çalışır. Bu asan olmayacaq. Çin yarımkeçiricilərin istehsalında liderliyini qoruyur. Digər tərəfdən Çin az qala dünyanın yarısına 5G texnologiyalarını ixrac edir. Çini bu sahədə sıxışdırmaq çətin olacaq.

Buna baxmayaraq, ABŞ-ın böyük şirkətləri Çindən Hindistana və Vyetnama köçməyə başlayıblar. Ancaq həmin şirkətlər bəzi problemlərlə üzləşiblər. Hindistanda və Vyetnamda istehsalı artırmaq üçün müasir infrastruktur yaradılmalıdır, şirkətlər bürokratik əngəllərlə üzləşməməlidirlər.

ABŞ süni intellektin yaradılması çalışmalarında da Hindistanla əlaqələri genişləndirməyə çalışır. Bundan başqa iki ölkə hərbi texnika üçün birgə mühərrik istehsalına başlamağı nəzərdə tuturlar. Bu işə Amerikanın məşhur “General Electric” şirkəti cəlb olunacaq. ABŞ Hindistan vətəndaşlarınz tətbiq etdiyi viza sistemini yumşaltmalıdır. Çünki hazırki məhdudiyyətlə proqram tərtibatçısı olan hindlilər ABŞ-da çalışa bilmirlər.

Vaşinqton Dehli ilə hərbi əməkdaşlığın qarşılığında Hindistanın Rusiyadan hərbi texnika alışını azaltmasını istəyir. Bunun üçün Hindistan-ABŞ hərbi əməkdaşlığı o səviyyədə genişlənməlidir ki, Dehli eyni adlı hərbi texnikanı ABŞ-dan ala bilsin. Hindistan mikro çiplərin istehsalı məsələsində Amerikadan dəstək gözləyir.

Russian Ambassador to Armenia Sergey Kopyrkin has a special mission. He constantly reminds Armenian officials that Armenia's ally is Russia and Yerevan will not be able to move away from the Kremlin. Kopırkin again said that there is cooperation in all fields of the two countries. With this, the Kremlin sent a message to Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan through its ambassador that "even if you want to, you will not be able to break away from Russia." "Relations are wide not only between our states, but also between nations and people," the ambassador said, repeating his opinion that he does not see an alternative in the alliance relations between the two countries, including in the field of security.

Despite this, Pashinyan has placed European observers in Armenia against the wishes of the Kremlin. Pashinyan has great hopes for them. This means that the Kremlin's and Ambassador Kopyrkei's warnings do not work. With this move, the Kremlin will consider using pressure tools against Pashinyan's government. The most perfect of these tools is natural gas. Russia may increase the price of gas for Armenia or create interruptions in the supply of blue fuel. In this case, Pashinyan will ask Tehran to increase the volume of gas it transports from Iran. If Tehran responds positively to Pashinyan's request, it will violate the Kremlin's plan and this will raise questions for Russian-Iranian relations.

Russia strongly opposes the European Union mission in Armenia. Emphasizing that this mission has military objectives, Russian officials and experts close to the Kremlin highlight two factors. First, Brussels wants to suppress Russia in Armenia. Secondly, through the Brussels military mission, it is trying to collect intelligence information about the military centers of Russia and Iran over Armenia.

While Russia protests so much, Iran does not make a sound, it does not warn its brother Armenia. This displeases Moscow. Because Moscow wants Tehran to take action. Tehran will be forced to join Moscow after the European Union military mission expands its activities in Armenia.

In his speech at the Munich Security Conference, President Ilham Aliyev said that official Baku is ready for dialogue with the Armenian community of Karabakh, but Armenians born in the region should represent the community in possible negotiations, "There will be no contact with Ruben Vardanyan, who was exported from Russia." Ruben Vardanyan is under double pressure. His activity in Karabakh also creates difficulties for the Armenians of the region. Therefore, there is a possibility that Ruben Vardanyan will leave the region. In such a case, who or who can have a dialogue with the official Baku Armenian community? The "leader" of the separatists, Araik Arutunyan, was born in Karabakh, but dialogue with him is also impossible, because Azerbaijan opened a criminal case against this separatist and admitted his role in the bombing of Ganja.

Former "minister of foreign affairs" of the separatists, currently "advisor" of Araik Arutunya, David Babayan said that they will decide who will represent them in the negotiations with official Baku. According to David Babayan, the person they will identify should be someone who knows Azerbaijan well as well as Karabakh. From the words of David Babayan, it can be understood that he and his "leader" also admit that Ruben Vadranyan has no opportunity to contact Baku. However, it is also impossible for official Baku to negotiate with "the person to be determined by the separatists". We should look for people in the Armenian community whose brains are not completely poisoned and who are ready to accept the existing realities. However, even if we find them with difficulty, we should know that they will be under the control of armed separatists and will not be able to deviate from the "instructions". When Karabakh started separatism in 1988, there were a few Armenians who understood that it was wrong, but they drowned out their voices and mysteriously disappeared after a while. The West needs an image that dialogue exists. We do not object, but our condition is clear: if Armenians want to live in Karabakh in safe conditions, they must accept the laws of Azerbaijan, otherwise they will have to leave the region.

Co Bayden keçmiş prezident Barak Obamanın kabinetində vitse-prezident olduğu illərdən Ukrayna ilə məşğul olur. Obama Ukraynanı Baydenə tapşırmışdı, o da tez-tez Kiyevə gedər və keçmiş prezident Petro Poroşenko ilə müzakirələr aparardı. Baydenin son ana qədər gizli saxlanılan indiki səfərinin xüsusi əhəmiyyəti var. Birincisi, Bayden Amerikanın Ukraynaya yeni yardımlarını Kiyevdə ikən açıqlamağı lazım bilib. İkincisi, Bayden Rusiyanın genişlənən hücumları fonunda Kreml sahibi Vladimir Putinə mesaj yollayıb ki, ABŞ Ukraynanın məğlub olmasına imkan verməyəcək və Ukrayna prezidenti Volodimir Zelenski əks-hücuma həvəsləndirəcək. Üçüncüsü, Bayden döyüşlərin gərgin olduğu hazırki günlərində Kiyevə getməklə Avropa ölkələrinə Ukraynaya hərbi texnika göndərmək məsələsində Amerika qədər cəsarətli olmağı işarə edib.

100 days of the Armenian separatists' "state minister" Ruben Vardanyan's work in this "position" have been completed. Vardanyan shared his thoughts on this in his profile. Stating that Vardanyan worked under the conditions of a "blockade" for 67 days of his tenure as "State Minister", he claimed that he fulfilled his duties and that the region did not collapse. The second part of Vardanyan's sentence is noteworthy: "In addition to external pressure, domestic opposition could not stop our plans." Ruben Vardanyan admitted for the first time that there are those among the separatists who want to prevent him. This man will not leave the region willingly. Vardanyan must either leave the region under our pressure, or Moscow must recall him, or those who oppose him must achieve their goal.

Ermənistanın baş naziri Nikol Paşinyan və xarici işlər naziri Ararat Mirzoyan Münhen Təhlükəsizlik Konfransında müxtəlif ikitərəfli görüşlər keçiriblər. Diqqətimi Ararat Mirzoyanın Kosovanın xarici işlər naziri Doniko Qervalla görüşü çəkib. Mirzoyan kosovolu həmkarına Laçın yolundakı vəziyyət barədə məlumat verib. Bu mövzu uzaq Kosovonun xarici işlər nazirini nə dərəcədə maraqlandırıb? Mirzoyanın kosovolu həmkarıyla görüşünün yeganə məqsədi “paralellərə” işarə etməkdir. Rəsmi İrəvan keçmiş illərdə Kosovonu misal çəkərək “Dağlıq Qarabağın da müstəqilliyinin” tanınması vacibliyini səsləndirirdilər. Buna baxmayaraq, İrəvan bu məsələdə dərinə gedə bilmədi. Çünki ağası Rusiya Serbiyanın ərazi bütövlüyünü dəstəkləyir, Kosovonun müstəqilliyinin əleyhinədir. Bu səbəbdən Ermənistan da Kosovonun müstəqilliyini tanımadı. Kosovonun müstəqilliyini ilk tanıyan ölkələrdən biri strateji müttəfiqimiz Türkiyədir. Azərbaycan Serbiyanın ərazi bütövlüyünü dəstəkləyir. Azərbaycanın eyni zamanda Kosovo ilə mənəvi bağlantısı olan Albaniya ilə sıx əlaqələri var. Prezident İlham Əliyev bir müddət əvvəl Albaniyaya rəsmi səfər etmişdi. Azərbaycan qazı Albaniyaya da çatdırılacaq. Azərbaycan Kosovonun müstəqilliyini tanımasa belə, albanlarla münasibətlərdə heç bir problemimiz yoxdur.

Various channels of Russia are broadcast on cable television. These channels are mouthpieces of the Russian government. Against the background of Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine, lies and misinformation on these channels are not abating. The most interesting thing is that in the past some Western documentary channels have been replaced by Russian documentary channels on cable television. Russian documentary channels are also used as a propaganda tool. The two films I watched on these channels in the last few days directly served the imperial interests of Russia.

In the first documentary, Poland was blamed for the start of World War II along with Germany. According to the "logic" of the makers of the documentary, Germany's invasion of Poland in 1939 was also caused by Warsaw's policy. The film, which is based on the criticism of Poland, does not talk about the occupation of the east of this country by the USSR in 1939 together with the Germans. The USSR generals delayed the liberation of the capital Warsaw whenever possible. There was nothing in the movie about that either. However, if the Polish insurgents against the German invaders were supported in Warsaw near the end of the war, the Polish capital could have been liberated sooner. USSR dictator Stalin deliberately delayed the liberation of Poland. There was nothing in the documentary about Stalin's order to kill thousands of Polish officers in the forests of Russia.

Second - the point of the documentary about Moldova was that this country has no future in its relations with Europe, Chisinau should try to unite with Russia, otherwise the country will be divided.

They show us all these movies. Those who know history will determine the extent of the lies in these films, while others will believe what is being said. That's the danger. There is a need for state structures that control cable television to pay attention to these issues. It is not an exception that the way of thinking that releases provocative films about Poland and Moldova will also release films against Azerbaijan.

The meeting of the President of Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev with the President of the Council of the European Union Charles Michel on February 17 in the framework of the Security Conference in Munich is a sign that there are no problems in relations. Of course, the fact that the European Union sent an observer mission to Azerbaijan's line of contact with Armenia for a period of two years raised questions in Baku. However, this should not cause tensions between Baku and Brussels. The observer mission does not have the opportunity and status to create problems for Azerbaijan on the contact line. Azerbaijan is interested in expanding energy cooperation with the European Union, our main trade partners are in Europe.

Last year, 4 meetings between the President of Azerbaijan and the Prime Minister of Armenia were held through the mediation of Charles Michel. The fifth meeting was caused by the intervention of France. However, the Azerbaijani president did not refuse the mediation of Brussels. On the contrary, Ilham Aliyev emphasized that Azerbaijan supports the Brussels peace process. It is no coincidence that in the meeting between Ilham Aliyev and Charles Michel, the normalization of relations between Azerbaijan and Armenia, negotiations on the peace treaty and the Brussels peace process were discussed. All that is required of Charles Michel is to exclude French President Emmanuel Macron from the negotiation process. Macron, who defends Armenia's position, is an obstacle to Brussels' mediation.

The statement of the spokeswoman of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Maria Zakharova, at the last conference held in Moscow, that "Western countries have thrown the format of the Minsk Group into the dustbin of history" needs correction. Yes, the second part of the sentence reflects the truth, the Minsk Group format has been thrown into the dustbin of history. However, the group was not dumped by the West, it was done by Azerbaijan and Russia. After the victory in the Second Karabakh War, Azerbaijan officially announced its withdrawal from the Minsk Group. If one of the parties has refused the institution of co-chairmanship, the group cannot work. The second major blow to the format of the Minsk Group was the invasion war that Russia started against Ukraine in February of last year. Until the war of occupation, Moscow did not abandon the format of the Minsk Group. Since the USA and France have accepted sanctions against Russia, it was impossible for these 3 countries to discuss the Karabakh issue at the same table. If sanctions against Russia were not applied, today Russia would like to continue the work of the Minsk Group format together with the USA and France. However, this is not possible against the background of the Ukrainian war, and even if the war ends, the co-chairs will not be able to work together. Nevertheless, Yerevan still hopes that the Minsk Group format will be revived. It is no coincidence that Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan sent his "peace proposals" to the co-chairing states - Russia, USA and France, along with Azerbaijan.